The principle of equality as a challenge to the democratic rule of law the constitutional idea of equality
pdf

Keywords

idea of equality, formal equality, substantive equality, prohibition of discrimination, rule of law, principles of social justice

Categories

How to Cite

Chorążewska, A. (2024) “The principle of equality as a challenge to the democratic rule of law the constitutional idea of equality”, Scientific Journal of Bielsko-Biala School of Finance and Law. Bielsko-Biała, PL, 28(4). doi: 10.19192/wsfip.sj4.2024.1.

Abstract

In legal science, the constitutional idea of equality is considered from two perspectives: formal and material. Proper realisation and protection of this constitutional value, therefore, involves not only the requirement to apply the law in accordance with the principle of equality before the law but also to enact the law so as to achieve a state of equality in the law. Detailed definitions have been developed of both components of the idea of equality. In substantive terms, the principle of equality and the prohibition of discrimination have been closely linked to the idea of social justice, which was to have a corrective effect on the understanding of the principle of substantive equality, by setting the appropriate criterion for its differentiation. The article shows that although the constitutional value in question has an established meaning in legal science, it is still a challenge for the rule of law. The study points to example areas of legal regulation that still require full harmonisation with the principle of equality.

https://doi.org/10.19192/wsfip.sj4.2024.1
pdf

References

Banaszak B., (1997). Human and civil rights in the new Constitution of the Republic of Poland, Sejm Review no. 5

Boć J. (ed.), (1998). Constitution and Commentary to the 1997 Constitution, Cologne Limited Publishing House, p. 70 - 71

Buszko J., (1986). Polish History 1864 - 1948, PWN Publishing House, p. 434 - 435

Falski J. B., (1997). The principle of equality in Polish constitutions (1781 - 1935), State and Law no. 1

Falski J., (2000). Evolution of the interpretation of the principle of equality in the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Tribunal, State and Law no. 1, p. 53

Garlicki L. (1998), Zasada równości i zakaz dyskryminacji w orzecznictwie Trybunału Konstytucyjnego, In: Obywatel - jego wolności i prawa. Zbiór studiów przygotowanych z okazji 10 - lecia urzędu RPO, Wydawnictwo Biuro RPO, p. 62-67, 78-80

Garlicki L., (1992). Review of the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court for 1991, Judicial Review no. 11 - 12, p. 56

Garlicki L., (2003). Note No. 13 to Article 32, In: The Constitution of the Republic of Poland. Komentarz (Commentary), ed. L. Garlicki, Vol. III, Wydawnictwo Sejmowe, p. 12 - 13.

Grzbczyk K., (2021). The theory of 'negative intellectual property space', State and Law no. 2, p. 71-87

Information on significant problems arising from the activities and jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court in 1997

Kołodziejczyk T., Pomianowska M., (1990). Constitutions in Poland 1791-1990, Przemiany Publishing House

The Venice Commission has issued an opinion on the changes concerning the regulation of the status of judges, https://www.gov.pl/web/sprawiedliwosc/komisja-wenecka-wydala-opinie-nt-zmian-dotyczacych-uregulowania-statusu-sedziow

Łabno A., (2006). The Principle of Equality and the Prohibition of Discrimination, In: Freedoms and Rights of the Individual and Their Guarantees in Practice, ed. L. Wisniewskie, Sejm Publishing House, p. 35.

Łukasiewicz J., (2004). Justice prerequisites of the principle of equality (theses of a speech). In: Zasada równości w prawie. Konferencja naukowa Rzeszów, 16 X 2003, ed. H. Zięba-Załucka, M. Kijowski, Wydawnictwo POBINTO.

M. Rafacz-Krzyżanowska, (1993). Z problematyki konstrukcyjnej zasady równości obywateli wobec prawa w świetle orzecznictwa Trybunału Konstytucyjnego, Praca i Zabezpieczenie Społeczne, no. 3

Oniszczuk J., (1998). Jurisprudence of the Constitutional Tribunal in the years 1986 - 96, Sejm Publishing House, p. 252

Przymusiński B., Breakthrough. The Prime Minister and Minister of Justice have finally identified the need for a systemic solution to the problem of neo-judges, https://wyborcza.pl/7,162657,31288756,przelom-premier-i-minister-sprawiedliwosci-nareszcie-okreslili.html

Przywora B., (2020). Can Article 32 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland (principle of equality) constitute an independent control model in cases initiated by a constitutional complaint? A contribution to the discussion, Public Law Review no. 7-8, p. 166-181

Safjan M., Social justice - intuition or theory, Rzeczpospolita 19.04.1999

Skrzydło W.(ed), (1997). Polskie prawo konstytucyjne, Wydawnictwo MORPOL, p. 48 - 51

Sokolewicz W., (1993). Notes on the draft Charter of Rights and Freedoms, State and Law no. 4

Literature and jurisprudence In: Barcz J., Grzelak A., Szyndlauer R. (ed.), (2022). Problem praworządności w Polsce w świetle orzecznictwa Trybunału Sprawiedliwości UE, Book I, vol. I, Dom Wydawniczy Elipsa

Tuleja P., (1997). Normative content of individual rights in the constitutional laws of the Republic of Poland, Sejm Publishing House, p. 91

CDL-PI(2024)009-e Poland - Urgent Joint Opinion of the Venice Commission and the Directorate General of Human Rights and Rule of Law of the Council of Europe on the draft law amending the Law on the National Council of the Judiciary of Poland, http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-PI(2024)009 (21.10.2024)

CDL-AD(2024)029-e Poland - Joint Opinion of the Venice Commission and the Directorate General Human Rights and Rule of Law on European standards regulating the status of judges, adopted by the Venice Commission at its 140th Plenary Session (Venice, 11-12 October 2024), https://venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-AD(2024)029-e (21.10.2024)

Judgment of the Constitutional Tribunal of 11 December 1996, K.11/96, OTK ZU 1996

Decision of the Constitutional Court of 11 February 1992, K.14/91, OTK ZU 1992, no. 7, p. 36-37

Decision of the Constitutional Court of 17 December1991, U.2/91, OTK ZU 1991, no. 10, p. 7-8

Decision of the Constitutional Court of 17 October 1995, K.10/95, OTK ZU 2/1995, no. 10

Decision of the Constitutional Tribunal of 20 December 1994, K.8/94, OTK ZU 1994, no. 43, p. 4

Decision of the Constitutional Court of 20 October 1992, K.1/92, OTK ZU 1992, part II, no. 23

Decision of the Constitutional Court of 24 October 1989, K.6/89, OTK ZU 1989, no. 7

Decision of the Constitutional Court of 24 September 1991, Kw.5/91, OTK ZU 1991, no. 5, p. 5

Decision of the Constitutional Court of 26 May 1986, U.1/86, OTK ZU 1986, no. 2

Decision of the Constitutional Court of 27 June 1995, K 4/94, OTK ZU 1995, part I, no. 16

Decision of the Constitutional Tribunal of 28 March 1994, K.14/94, OTK ZU 1994, part. I, no. 13

Decision of the Constitutional Tribunal of 29 January 1992, K.15/91, OTK ZU 1992, part I, no. 8, p. 10

Decision of the Constitutional Court of 3 March 1987, P.2/87, OTK ZU 1987, no. 2

Decision of the Constitutional Tribunal of 3 September 1996, K.10/96, OTK ZU 1996, no. 4, item. 33, p. 5-6

Decision of the Constitutional Court of 5 November 1986, U.5/86, OTK ZU 1986, no. 1, p. 14

Decision of the Constitutional Court of 5 November 1986, U.5/86, OTK ZU 1986, no. 1, p. 1

Decision of the Constitutional Court of 9 March 1988, U.7/87, OTK ZU 1988, no. 1, p. 14

Decision of the Constitutional Court of 9 January 1996, K.18/95, OTK ZU 1/1996, no. 1

Decision of the Supreme Court Civil Chamber of 16 September 2024, III CB 65/24

Decision of the Supreme Court of 13 April 2023, III CB 6/23

Decision of the Constitutional Court of 2 February 2000, Ts 10/00, OTK ZU 2000 no. 3 item. 103, p. 487 - 488

Decision of the Constitutional Court of 3.10.2019, Ts 50/18, OTK-B 2020, no. 5

Resolution of the 3 Combined Chambers of the Supreme Court (legal principle) of 23 January 2020, BSA I-4110-1/20

Resolution of 7 judges of the Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court of 2 June 2022, I KZP 2/22

Act of 8 December 2017 amending the Act on the National Council of the Judiciary and certain other acts, Journal of Laws. 2018, no. 3

Judgment of the ECtHR of 23 November 2023, Walesa v Poland, Application no. 50849/21

Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 12.04.2011, SK 62/08, OTK-A 2011 no. 3, item. 22

Judgment of the Constitutional Tribunal of 24 October 2001, SK 10/01, OTK ZU 2001, no. 7, item. 225

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Anna Chorążewska

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.