Słowa kluczowe
economic challenges
entrepreneurial growth rate
Jak cytować
Abstrakt
This research examines the role of entrepreneurial strategies in overcoming economic challenges across ten countries: the USA, Kazakhstan, UK, India, China, Poland, Brazil, Kenya, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey, during the period 2019–2023. By analyzing the impact of key strategies such as digital adoption, innovation, access to financing, and policy support, this study explores their influence on two key indicators: start-up survival rate and entrepreneurial growth rate. The research takes a quantitative approach that employs panel data regression, and utilizes secondary data from global economic databases. Results show that entrepreneurial activity is strong worldwide, but sustainability of start-ups dramatically differs between developed, emerging and developing economies. Higher Entrepreneurial growth rate and Start up survival rate is observed in the countries with more robust institutional support and access to resources. Lastly the study presents the possible recommendations for nurturing entrepreneurial ecosystems for sustainable business growth and economic resilience especially in the emerging and the developing markets.
Bibliografia
Daradkeh, M. Navigating the complexity of entrepreneurial ethics: A systematic review and future research agenda. Sustainability 2023, 15, 11099. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411099.
Lin, S.; Winkler, C.; Wang, S.; Chen, H. Regional determinants of poverty alleviation through entrepreneurship in China. Bus. Entrep. Innov. Towar. Poverty Reduct. 2021, 32, 41–62. ISBN 9781003176107.
Filser, M.; Tiberius, V.; Kraus, S.; Zeitlhofer, T.; Kailer, N.; Müller, A. Opportunity recognition: Conversational foundations and pathways ahead. Entrep. Res. J. 2023, 13, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2020-0124.
Kumar, A.; Kumra, R.; Singh, R. Base of the pyramid producers’ constraints: An integrated review and research agenda. J. Bus. Res. 2022, 140, 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.046.
Thurik, A.R.; Audretsch, D.B.; Block, J.H.; Burke, A.; Carree, M.A.; Dejardin, M.; Rietveld, C.A.; Sanders, M.; Stephan, U.; Wiklund, J. The impact of entrepreneurship research on other academic fields. Small Bus. Econ. 2024, 62, 727–751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-023-00781-3.
Chen, X.; Zheng, Y.; Chen, H. Does opportunity co-creation help the poor entrepreneurs? Evidence from China. Front. Psychol. 2023, 14, 1093120. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1093120.
Deng, Q.; Li, E.; Yang, Y. Politics, policies and rural poverty alleviation outcomes: Evidence from Lankao County, China. Habitat Int. 2022, 127, 102631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102631.
Leppäaho, T.; Mainela, T.; Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, E. Opportunity beliefs in internationalization: A microhistorical approach. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 2023, 54, 1298–1312. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-023-00599-x.
Pidduck, R.J.; Clark, D.R.; Lumpkin, G.T. Entrepreneurial mindset: Dispositional beliefs, opportunity beliefs, and entrepreneurial behavior. J. Small Bus. Manag. 2023, 61, 45–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1907582.
Wu, J.; Si, S.; Yan, H. Reducing poverty through the shared economy: Creating inclusive entrepreneurship around institutional voids in China. Asian Bus. Manag. 2022, 21, 155–183. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-020-00113-3.
Guo, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, Y. Targeted poverty alleviation and its practices in rural China: A case study of Fuping county, Hebei Province. J. Rural Stud. 2022, 93, 430–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.01.007.
Zellweger, T.M.; Zenger, T.R. Entrepreneurs as scientists: A pragmatist approach to producing value out of uncertainty. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2023, 48, 379–408. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2020.0503.
Patzelt, H.; Preller, R.; Breugst, N. Understanding the life cycles of entrepreneurial teams and their ventures: An agenda for future research. Entrep. Theory Pract. 2021, 45, 1119–1153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258720978386.
Zhao, S.; Zhou, Y.; Guan, H.; Xu, W. Entrepreneurial passion psychology- based influencing factors of new venture performance. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 696963. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.696963.
Bilgili, H.; Campbell, J.T.; O’Leary-Kelly, A.M.; Ellstrand, A.E.; Johnson, J.L. The final countdown: Regulatory focus and the phases of CEO retirement. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2020, 45, 58–84. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2016.0455.
Huang, L.; Xie, G.; Blenkinsopp, J.; Huang, R.; Bin, H. Crowdsourcing for sustainable urban logistics: Exploring the factors influencing crowd workers’ participative behavior. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3091. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083091.
Shwedeh, F.; Adelaja, A.A.; Ogbolu, G.; Kitana, A.; Taamneh, A.; Aburayya, A.; A Salloum, S. Entrepreneurial innovation among international students in the UAE: Differential role of entrepreneurial education using SEM analysis. Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Stud. 2023, 6, 266–280. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v6i2.1328.
Wang, Z.; Shao, Y. Decide to take entrepreneurial action: Role of entrepreneurial cognitive schema on cognitive process of exploiting entrepreneurial opportunity. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4709. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084709.
Gherghina Ștefan, C.; Botezatu, M.A.; Hosszu, A.; Simionescu, L.N. Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs): The Engine of Economic Growth through Investments and Innovation. Sustainability 2020, 12, 347. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010347.
Redondo-Rodríguez, L.; Yábar, D.C.P.-B.; Díaz-Garrido, E. Impact of Technological Innovation on Digital Entrepreneurship and the Effects on the Economy. Int. Entrep. Manag. J. 2023, 19, 1501–1526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-023-00873-2.
Alawamleh, M.; Francis, Y.H.; Alawamleh, K.J. Entrepreneurship Challenges: The Case of Jordanian Start-Ups. J. Innov. Entrep. 2023, 12, 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-023-00286-z.
Sewpersadh, N.S. Disruptive Business Value Models in the Digital Era. J. Innov. Entrep. 2023, 12, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-022-00252-1.
Taques, F.H.; López, M.G.; Basso, L.F.; Areal, N. Indicators Used to Measure Service Innovation and Manufacturing Innovation. J. Innov. Knowl. 2021, 6, 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.12.001.
Koldovskiy, A. Strategic Infrastructure Transformation: Revolutionizing Financial Sector Management for Enhanced Success. Acta Academiae Beregsasiensis. Economics 2024, 5, 323–332. https://doi.org/10.58423/2786-6742/2024-5-323-332.
Prokopenko, O.; Chechel, A.; Koldovskiy, A.; Kldiashvili, M. Innovative Models of Green Entrepreneurship: Social Impact on Sustainable Development of Local Economies. Economics Ecology Socium 2024, 8, 89–111. https://doi.org/10.61954/2616-7107/2024.8.1-8
Mazur, V.; Koldovskyi, A.; Ryabushka, L.; Yakubovska, N. The Formation of a Rational Model of Management of the Construction Company’s Capital Structure. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice 2023, 6(53), 128–144. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.6.53.2023.4223.
IMF. International Financial Statistics. IMF Data. 2023. Available online: https://data.imf.org/?sk=4c514d48-b6ba-49ed-8ab9-52b0c1a0179b&sId=-1
IMF. Global Financial Stability Report. IMF Data. 2024. Available online: https://data.imf.org/?sk=388dfa60-1d26-4ade-b505-a05a558d9a42
World Bank. The World Development Indicators. World Bank, 2023. Available online: https://datatopics.worldbank.org/world-development-indicators/
World Bank. World Bank Open Data. World Bank, 2024. Available online: https://data.worldbank.org/
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Prawa autorskie (c) 2025 Andrey Chshelokovskiy