Abstract
Interest in the topic comes from empirical observations of various professional groups and people operating within particular professions. An extremely interesting phenomenon is the diversity of attitudes towards the profession. Extremely negative, reluctant attitudes on the one hand, up to full fascination and delight on the other are observed. Relatively least common is a strong and positive commitment to the profession, treating work not only as a financial necessity or fate, but as a joy. There are people who would not change their profession to any other, and a retrospective analysis of experience allows us to reach statements about great satisfaction with the chosen profession type of work or type of activity. Assuming that the status of a master in the artist's profession determines the personality traits of young people interested in artistic activity, knowledge of the essential features of the biographies of several dozen professionally and environmentally verified artists in Poland and Germany allows for the creation of a model for implementing the process of shaping a personality that functions positively in this type of professions.
References
Adamczyk W., Decision and professional success of visual artists. Comparativ research of Polish and German artists, ATH Publishing House of , Bielsko-Biała 2003, pp. 46-56, pp. 56-61.
Adamczyk W., The level of professional functioning of visual artists - the role and importance of personal factors motivating the choice of profession. in : Wokół wychronich ed. Czubala D., Grzybek G. ATH Publishing House, Bielsko-Biala. 2003. pp. 136-145.
Frankl VE, The doctor and the soul. An introduction to Logoteraphy , Plenum, New York , 1955. pp. 24-29.
Alper G., Portrait of the artist as a young patient. Psy chodynamic studies of the creative personality . New York. Insight Books. 1992.p. 67-81.
Allport G. & Becoming W. Basic consideration for a psychology of personality New Haven. 1995. pp. 22-34.
Amabile, T. M., Goldfarb, P., Brackfield , S. C. Social influences on creativity: Evaluation, coaction, and surveillance. Creativity Research Journal, Vol. 3, 1990. pp. 6 – 21.
Amabile, T. M. Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westvieu Press, Inc. 1996.p. 67-82.
Anderson HH Creativity in perspective. in:: Creativity and its cultivation . New York 1995. pp. 85-91.
Arnheim R. The creative process . Psychologische Beitrage 1962. Vol. 6. pp. 234 – 244. Widening and personal freedom. New York. 1968.
Hermans HJ & Van Gilst W., Self - narrative and collective myth. Van Gilst Willem Anaanalysis of the narcissmus story. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science. 1991. vol 23/4/. pp.423 – 440.
Mc Cormick EJ & Tiffin J. Industrial psychology . Englewood Cl.1974.p. 46-72
Parnes SJ & Meadow A. Development of Individual Creative Talent. in: C.W. Taylor & F. Barr, Scientific of Creativity. New York 1963. Willey.
Pietrasiński Z. Creative thinking. Warsaw 1969. PWN. pp.87-92.
Popek S. The creative process -as a determinant of education through art." Lublin 1977. pp. 22-36.
Rogers CR Towards theory of creativity. In: Anderson HH (ed) Creativity and Its Cultivation". New York 1959. Harper and Row. pp.23-41.
Simonton D. K. Emergence and realization of genius: The lives and works of 120 classical composers". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1991. Vol. 61.
Sieczynski T. Periodic employee evaluations. Warsaw 1976.
Strelau , J. Psychologia, Gdanskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne 2000, p. 467.
Stohs JM Young adult predictors and midlife outcomes of sturving artists careers. A longitudinal study of male artists. "Journal of Creative Behavior ". 1991. Vol. 25
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Witold Adamczyk, Anna Podolak, Joanna Jarczak, Tadeusz Ambroży